Archive for the ‘magick’ Category

World’s Oldest Known Magic Text Translated Into English For The First Time

April 17, 2007

Greed, Gummo:2, 6006 YD

After lying almost untouched in the vaults of an Italian university for 500 years, a book on the magic arts written by Leonardo da Vinci’s best friend and teacher has been translated into English for the first time.

The world’s oldest magic text, De viribus quantitatis (On The Powers Of Numbers) was penned by Luca Pacioli, a Franciscan monk who shared lodgings with Da Vinci and is believed to have helped the artist with The Last Supper.

It was written in Italian by Pacioli between 1496 and 1508 and contains the first ever reference to card tricks as well as guidance on how to juggle, eat fire and make coins dance. It is also the first work to note that Da Vinci was left-handed.
Although the book has been described as the “foundation of modern magic and numerical puzzles”, it was never published and has languished in the archives of the University of Bologna, seen only by a small number of scholars since the Middle Ages.

The transcription has taken eight years, involved several translators and cost thousands of pounds. William Kalush, a magician and the founder of the Conjuring Arts Research Centre in New York, who financed the project, said: “This book is the first major manual that is primarily concerned with teaching how to perform magic.”

“Sources of magic methods go back at least to the first century, but this book teaches not only the methods but also gives a glimpse into how one might perform them with an eye to entertaining an audience.”

The book was rediscovered after David Singmaster, a mathematician, came across a reference to it in a 19th-century manuscript.

“It’s the foundation not only of modern magic but of numerical puzzles too,” he said. “We don’t know why, but this huge thing has been hidden away in the University of Bologna we presume since the time of Pacioli.”

Experts believe it will give a greater understanding of magical history as well as insights into Da Vinci’s life and work. Carlo Pedretti, a leading art historian, studied the original Italian text in Bologna in 1954. He said: “It’s a very important document. It shows how much Da Vinci liked games and tricks – but only if they had scientific foundations. It’s also a very important document from the viewpoint of his work as it mentions The Last Supper.”

The manuscript contains a previously unknown anecdote about Da Vinci.

Dr Pedretti said: “Leonardo was working as an architect and general engineer for Cesare Borgia – the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI – who wanted to establish a new state in Italy in 1502. On their journey they came across a river and Da Vinci very quickly figured a way to use tree trunks to build a bridge – this is the first time we hear this story.”

Pacioli was born in Tuscany in 1445 and was a travelling mathematics tutor. He is often called the father of modern accountancy because his book The Summa (1494) contains the first published description of double-entry bookkeeping, accountancy’s basic technique.

He lived with Da Vinci in Milan from 1496 for several years and taught maths and geometry to the painter, scientist and inventor. They collaborated on many projects including a book, De Divina Proportione (1509), which Da Vinci also illustrated.

De viribus quantitatis is divided into three sections: mathematical problems, puzzles and tricks, and a collection of proverbs and verses.

Tricks include how to write a sentence on the petals of a rose, wash your hands in molten lead and make an egg walk across a table (“commoners will consider it a miracle”.) It also contains some of the first known European examples of numerical puzzles, which are similar to those printed in today’s newspapers, such as Sudoku.

There is also a diagram of a moving piece puzzle – such as those found in Christmas crackers – which was the medieval version of the Rubik’s cube.

Elsewhere in its pages, Pacioli explains a technique for writing in code, which may have been inspired by Da Vinci, whose left-handedness meant he sometimes wrote backwards making the words decipherable only with the use of a mirror.

No originality attaches to this work and Pacioli himself called it a compendium. Some of the problems are found in the notebooks of Da Vinci and although he never mentions Pacioli directly, experts believe that De viribus quantitatis shows their relationship was mutually beneficial.

Lori Pieper, the manuscript’s main translator, said: “There’s one particular case when Pacioli describes a mariner’s clock or compass.”

“He writes, ‘Well Leonardo, you can do more of this on your own.’ It implies that Pacioli also gave inventions to Leonardo and it wasn’t just a one-way street. They learned from each other.”

Although Da Vinci was a polymath interested in everything from art to anatomy, and Pacioli was a man obsessed by figures and logic, some believe both were enchanted by the magic of numbers.

“Maths and magic are intertwined,” said Eddie Dawes, the Magic Circle’s historian. “There are a number of magic tricks done with maths which date back a long time – like prediction tricks. The means by which magic is produced has obviously changed since Pacioli’s day but the basic effects remain much the same.”

De viribus quantitatis was written at a time when people were burnt at the stake for witchcraft and in the manuscript Pacioli seems to want to demystify trickery and to prove it was more about sleight of hand than supernatural powers.

Mr Singmaster said: “Perhaps he wanted to help rid us of our superstitions and make the world more rational and understandable.”

The translation of De viribus quantitatis will be published next year to coincide with its 500th anniversary. Until then, Da Vinci aficionados and aspiring magicians will have to be content with visiting the Conjuring Arts Research Centre where a copy will be kept.

Some of Pacioli’s tricks:


Take cool well water and soak your hands for a while; then shake them, you can put them in a pan full of melted lead over a flame, and it will not cook you. It is even better if you put some ground rock alum in the water … to the uneducated … it will appear to be a miracle.


Take some magnetic powder and rub it on a copper coin before putting the coin in some vinegar. Then take a little bit of the magnetic powder between your thumb and index finger and tap the glass of water, where the coin is, and it will come up and go down … with your hand.


You will be able to teach the said boy, since he is closed [in a room] or at a distance, to guess which card some people have touched without seeing it, by way of the numbers you have agreed on with him: that is, by placing a number on the figures and cards according to the trick, and according to the agreement made between you … since it always appears to those who do not know the way … that all these things are done by the magic art of divination. And thus with spots on dice, and the ring, so you will always be able to do stupendous things with him … but you must do it cautiously, so that you might not be embarrassed, since the more secret things are, the more beautiful they are.


Take an egg that has been emptied through a hole made with a pin, and then filled in with white wax, so the hole cannot be seen. And get a hair from a braid, the longest you can, and attach it to the shell with … solid wax. Fasten another bit of wax to the other end … placing the egg on the table, with the nail of your middle finger, pick up the said wax, and by moving it here and there … it will follow. This must be [done] in a place not too brightly lit, with onlookers at a distance.


The Secret Of The Number 23

June 23, 2006

The secret of the number 23 is:

-the secret of science

-the secret of magick

-the secret of the Law of Fives

-the secret of tarot

-the secret of bible interpretation

-the secret of film interpretation

-the secret of art interpretation

-the secret of art

-the secret of rorschach tests

-the secret of metaprogramming

-the secret of body dismorphia

-the secret of consciousness

-the secret of bigotry

-the secret of Finnegans Wake

-the secret of poetry

-the secret of palmistry

-the secret of optimism

-the secret of history interpretation

-the secret of music appreciation

-the secret of beauty

-the secret of hermeticism

-the secret of sadness

-the secret of happiness

What E Didn’t Understand About "V"

March 20, 2006

Roger Ebert’s review for “V for Vendetta” was a mostly glowing one (much better than the pan he gave Batman in 1989, which I still haven’t fully forgiven him for) and while he didn’t make the standard mistake most reviewers have been making regarding Evey’s “education”, in the last line of his review he does miss one large point of V’s message.

Close to the end of his review, Ebert states: “The movie ends with a violent act that left me, as a lover of London, intensely unhappy; surely V’s enemy is human, not architectural.”

Let us put aside for a moment that V is simply following through with what Guy Fawkes originally attempted in 1605, that is part of the answer, but the less important part.

Ebert is correct, of course, V’s enemy ARE human, but humans who use symbolism as a means of controlling the population. His genius is to use these same symbols in reverse.

The government buildings hold a form of magic in them because people believe they do, the same way our money holds magic because we believe it does. The government buildings are treated differently than other buildings because, apparently, ‘important’ matters are dealt with there. The government buildings are also symbolic of government itself.

The government buildings of London were attacked for much the same reason the Pentagon was attacked on 9/11, namely that they both represent the government as a whole. To destroy the government buildings is to allow the people to believe that the government is not magical, is not lead by the hand of God, is not impenetrable. Poke holes in someone’s symbols and you poke holes in their magic.


December 12, 2005

The space allotted to magic is getting smaller and smaller every year. Even the magicians are abandoning it, they call themselves illusionists now and hide under sidewalks, or freeze themselves inside ice. But where is the magic?

I talked to a four year old girl one day who didn’t believe in fairies. Can she even be described as a child?

Movies about the Illiad are made, but all the gods are squeezed out like from a freeze-dried piece of fruit. Does this make the movie more realistic? Did the gods not exist for the Greeks?

Quantum Physics tells us that once a particle has come in contact with another particle it will continue to influence it no matter how far away it is. Soon they will be telling us that isn’t magic either.